I’m a landscape photographer. I grew up in Uppland, Sweden, which is flat, glacially scraped, and can charitably be described as subtle. Most people drive through it on the way to somewhere more interesting. I spent my childhood learning to look at it anyway, which turns out to be useful training for a photographer, even if that wasn’t the plan.
I moved to the Pacific Northwest in my early thirties and found the opposite problem. Old-growth canopy, volcanic peaks, water everywhere, everything shouting for attention at once. The challenge there isn’t finding something to look at. It’s learning to look past all of it until something quieter comes through. Between the two, I’ve spent a disproportionate amount of time in fog, rain, and the kind of light that can’t decide what it wants to be. I keep finding reasons to be in both.
By day I’m a software architect, which is roughly as romantic as it sounds. Years of building systems, structuring complexity, thinking in abstractions. Photography has taught me to value what lives outside those structures, the stuff that won’t sit still long enough to be diagrammed. The interesting work happens at the boundary between the two, and I suspect it always will.
I spend my time in mountains, along coastlines, and in the desert, sometimes alone, usually on foot, always for longer than is strictly reasonable. I’ve also spent a lot of time underwater, in caves and in the cold green murk of Puget Sound. Diving taught me something photography confirmed later: a place won’t open up to you until you stop performing the role of visitor. This takes longer than you’d think, and I’m still not reliably good at it.
I’m unreasonably picky about cameras. I’ve owned more than I’d care to admit, and the ones that survive the cull are always the ones that disappear in use. I shoot Hasselblad medium format (digital and analog) and sometimes other full-frame digital cameras, not because of what’s printed on the body but because they feel effortless in the hand, which is the only criterion that matters to me. What they do, quietly, is make you care about each frame. Not through discipline, but through a kind of weight: the sense that this particular moment might deserve your full attention before you press the shutter. Most of the time I’m wrong about that, and the frame goes nowhere. But the caring is the thing. Without it, I’m just collecting rectangles.
Peographic is the home for all of it. The curated work lives in the galleries. The rest, the thinking, the trail notes, the photographs that don’t belong in a gallery but belong somewhere, the occasional argument with myself, lives in the Field Notes. The ongoing (possibly futile, probably necessary) attempt to understand what it means to pay real attention to a place runs through everything.
